[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE350D1.4070503@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:50:25 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, minchan@...il.com, kosaki.motohiro@...il.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, mel@....ul.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/7] mm: get unmapped area from VMA tree
On 06/21/2012 05:01 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> + /* Go left if it looks promising. */
>> + if (node_free_hole(rb_node->rb_left)>= len&&
>> + vma->vm_start - len>= lower_limit) {
>> + rb_node = rb_node->rb_left;
>> + continue;
>
> If we already are at a vma whose start has a lower address than the
> overall length, does it make sense to check for a left hole?
> I.e. shouldn't this be inside the if (vma->vm_start> len) block?
You are right, I can move this in under the
conditional.
>> + if (!found_here&& node_free_hole(rb_node->rb_left)>= len) {
>> + /* Last known hole is to the right of this subtree. */
>
> "to the left"
Actually, it is to the right. We walked left from
our parent to get here, so the holes found so far
are to the right of here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists