[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE3A495.1030008@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:47:49 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
zheng.z.yan@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Add generic Intel uncore PMU support
On 06/21/2012 03:43 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Regardless of that, we have some head-scratching to do:
>
>
> #define UNCORE_PMU_HRTIMER_INTERVAL (60 * NSEC_PER_SEC)
>
> and
>
> #define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000L
>
> and 60 billion doesn't fit in 32 bits. So do we fix the
> perf_event_intel_uncore.c callsites? Or do we fix the
> UNCORE_PMU_HRTIMER_INTERVAL definition? Or do we fix the NSEC_PER_SEC
> definition?
>
> I'm thinking perhaps the latter. What *is* the type of a nanosecond in
> Linux? include/linux/ktime.h is pretty insistent that it is u64. If
> so, NSEC_PER_SEC should logically have type ULL. But changing both its
> size and signedness is a pretty big change.
We could change the size only. The range from 9223372036.854775808 to
18446744073.709551615 seconds (292-584 years) isn't really that significant.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists