[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWUo3uffM4NCUORJXR1pdPaf0E1Sws1hwVNAibHg5_yjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:37:57 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lenb@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SNB PCI root information
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>> if the vendor provide _PXM, that _PXM should be right and be
>> trusted.
>>
>> if the vendor does not provide _PXM, we can have command line
>> to input it before user can get one updated BIOS from vendor.
>
> So how about an incorrect _PXM, or a slightly inefficient one?
> Why shouldn't it be possible for the user to override it?
Try to keep the code simple.
>
> I mean, if we create a parameter space that tweaks data then why
> not make it complete and allow *all* firmware data to be
> (optionally) modified, from the kernel boot line?
that pxm/node for pci device should be consistent with srat table etc,
so better solution is that BIOS keep them consistent.
If BIOS provide _PXM for pci device, the _PXM should have more chance
to be right.
Anyway if you insist that it should cover that wrong case, let me
check if it could be done simply.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists