[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFub=KRdM2Mc1RXa_HfYO8gSxpyCpsP9Z1YHRULCLwNDnXQyEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:33:35 +0300
From: Ozan Çağlayan <ozancag@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mcgrof@...nel.org
Subject: get_unused_fd and get_unused_fd_flags
Hi,
With,
commit 1027abe8827b47f7e9c4ed6514fde3d44f79963c
Author: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed Jul 30 04:13:04 2008 -0400
[PATCH] merge locate_fd() and get_unused_fd()
New primitive: alloc_fd(start, flags). get_unused_fd() and
get_unused_fd_flags() become wrappers on top of it.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Two wrappers get_unused_fd() and get_unused_fd_flags() are introduced.
get_unused_fd() is an exported one-liner:
int get_unused_fd(void)
{
return alloc_fd(0, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_unused_fd);
But get_unused_fd_flags() is implemented through a macro:
#define get_unused_fd_flags(flags) alloc_fd(0, (flags))
Both are wrappers around alloc_fd(). I'm quite new to this stuff but
why there's an asymmetry in here? One is exposed, the other is not.
(BTW: I'm doing compat-drm stuff for GSoC and I have to call
get_unused_fd_flags() but since alloc_fd() is not exported, this
doesn't work.)
Thanks :)
--
Ozan Çağlayan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists