linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Minimal build without libelf dependency (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1340358478.18025.51.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:47:58 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Minimal build without libelf
 dependency (v2)

On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 14:37 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> And then I realized that the perf record needs to know about the
> build-id's anyway. :( So I implemented a poor man's version of elf
> parser only for parsing the build-id info. 

Why? the very first versions didn't know about any of that nonsense :-)
It works just fine as long as you don't go change binaries around.

That said, you did the work already, so no objection, just saying
builtids aren't that important.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/