[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9wHMTYoxVqj3Ls3Y7NEwgL4Y=XnxGFzyxfy4bseMR_Hhzp7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:48:13 +0800
From: chao xie <xiechao.linux@...il.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rjw@...k.pl, pavel@....cz, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: pm runtime and system suspend resume
2012/6/21 Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, chao xie wrote:
>
>> I check the code, __device_suspend will invoke dev->pm_domain->ops
>> first if dev->pm_domain is not NULL.
>> Taking "suspend" as esample, i can do the following things in the
>> dev->pm_domain->ops->suspend
>> 1. invoke dev->driver->pm->suspend for suspending the device
>> 2. do what we do in dev->pm_domain->ops->runtime_suspend for
>> suspending the surrounded logic, for example, shutdown the phy or
>> clocks.
>> So is above implementation fine?
>
> Yes, that sounds like it will work. Watch out for the case where your
> device is already runtime-suspended when a system suspend occurs.
>
> Have you read section 6 in Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt? It is
> related to your question.
>
I will read the document. Thanks very much.
> Alan Stern
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists