linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] memcg: cleanup typos in mem cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1340366474-28228-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:01:14 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
To:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Han Ying <yinghan@...gle.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: cleanup typos in mem cgroup

From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>

---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 776fc57..9e3c74a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ static const char * const mem_cgroup_events_names[] = {
 
 /*
  * Per memcg event counter is incremented at every pagein/pageout. With THP,
- * it will be incremated by the number of pages. This counter is used for
- * for trigger some periodic events. This is straightforward and better
+ * it will be incremented by the number of pages. This counter is used for
+ * trigger some periodic events. This is straightforward and better
  * than using jiffies etc. to handle periodic memcg event.
  */
 enum mem_cgroup_events_target {
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
  *
  * If there are kernel internal actions which can make use of some not-exact
  * value, and reading all cpu value can be performance bottleneck in some
- * common workload, threashold and synchonization as vmstat[] should be
+ * common workload, threshold and synchonization as vmstat[] should be
  * implemented.
  */
 static long mem_cgroup_read_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
@@ -2213,7 +2213,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_do_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	if (mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(mem_over_limit))
 		return CHARGE_RETRY;
 
-	/* If we don't need to call oom-killer at el, return immediately */
+	/* If we don't need to call oom-killer at all, return immediately */
 	if (!oom_check)
 		return CHARGE_NOMEM;
 	/* check OOM */
@@ -2291,7 +2291,7 @@ again:
 		 * In that case, "memcg" can point to root or p can be NULL with
 		 * race with swapoff. Then, we have small risk of mis-accouning.
 		 * But such kind of mis-account by race always happens because
-		 * we don't have cgroup_mutex(). It's overkill and we allo that
+		 * we don't have cgroup_mutex(). It's overkill and we allow that
 		 * small race, here.
 		 * (*) swapoff at el will charge against mm-struct not against
 		 * task-struct. So, mm->owner can be NULL.
@@ -2396,7 +2396,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 }
 
 /*
- * Cancel chrages in this cgroup....doesn't propagate to parent cgroup.
+ * Cancel charges in this cgroup....doesn't propagate to parent cgroup.
  * This is useful when moving usage to parent cgroup.
  */
 static void __mem_cgroup_cancel_local_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/