[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340377510.1478.10.camel@leonhard>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:05:10 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Minimal build without libelf
dependency (v2)
Hi Peter,
2012-06-22 (금), 11:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra:
> On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 14:37 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > And then I realized that the perf record needs to know about the
> > build-id's anyway. :( So I implemented a poor man's version of elf
> > parser only for parsing the build-id info.
>
> Why? the very first versions didn't know about any of that nonsense :-)
> It works just fine as long as you don't go change binaries around.
>
> That said, you did the work already, so no objection, just saying
> builtids aren't that important.
I'm not sure I understood you correctly. But 'perf record' needs to know
about the build-id's to save them to perf.data for 'perf report' later.
And 'perf archive' also needs to know about them to select necessary
binaries for the session.
--
Regards,
Namhyung Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists