[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1340378241-6458-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:17:18 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/22] rcu: Allow RCU grace-period initialization to be preempted
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
RCU grace-period initialization is currently carried out with interrupts
disabled, which can result in 200-microsecond latency spikes on systems
on which RCU has been configured for 4096 CPUs. This patch therefore
makes the RCU grace-period initialization be preemptible, which should
eliminate those latency spikes. Similar spikes from grace-period cleanup
and the forcing of quiescent states will be dealt with similarly by later
patches.
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
Reported-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index faf4860..e5b4532 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
* don't start another one.
*/
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ cond_resched();
continue;
}
@@ -1069,6 +1070,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
*/
rsp->fqs_need_gp = 1;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ cond_resched();
continue;
}
@@ -1079,10 +1081,10 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_INIT; /* Stop force_quiescent_state. */
rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
- raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* leave irqs disabled. */
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
/* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
- raw_spin_lock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ get_online_cpus();
/*
* Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the rcu_node
@@ -1102,7 +1104,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
* due to the fact that we have irqs disabled.
*/
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
@@ -1113,15 +1115,16 @@ static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
rnp->level, rnp->grplo,
rnp->grphi, rnp->qsmask);
- raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ cond_resched();
}
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
/* force_quiescent_state() now OK. */
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT;
- raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ put_online_cpus();
}
return 0;
}
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists