linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/17] rcu: Add ACCESS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1340379312-6684-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:34:58 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/17] rcu: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to ->qlen accesses

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>

The _rcu_barrier() function accesses other CPUs' rcu_data structure's
->qlen field without benefit of locking.  This commit therefore adds
the required ACCESS_ONCE() wrappers around accesses and updates that
need it.

ACCESS_ONCE() is not needed when a CPU accesses its own ->qlen, or
in code that cannot run while _rcu_barrier() is sampling ->qlen fields.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index d938671..cdc101e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp,
 		rsp->qlen += rdp->qlen;
 		rdp->n_cbs_orphaned += rdp->qlen;
 		rdp->qlen_lazy = 0;
-		rdp->qlen = 0;
+		ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen) = 0;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	}
 	smp_mb(); /* List handling before counting for rcu_barrier(). */
 	rdp->qlen_lazy -= count_lazy;
-	rdp->qlen -= count;
+	ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen) -= count;
 	rdp->n_cbs_invoked += count;
 
 	/* Reinstate batch limit if we have worked down the excess. */
@@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
 	rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
 
 	/* Add the callback to our list. */
-	rdp->qlen++;
+	ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)++;
 	if (lazy)
 		rdp->qlen_lazy++;
 	else
@@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	rdp->grpmask = 1UL << (cpu - rdp->mynode->grplo);
 	init_callback_list(rdp);
 	rdp->qlen_lazy = 0;
-	rdp->qlen = 0;
+	ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen) = 0;
 	rdp->dynticks = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting != DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks->dynticks) != 1);
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/