[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1206221722040.27860@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:26:07 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xen/events: fix unmask_evtchn for PV on HVM guests
When unmask_evtchn is called, if we already have an event pending, we
just set evtchn_pending_sel waiting for local_irq_enable to be called.
That is because PV guests set the irq_enable pvops to
xen_irq_enable_direct that also handles pending events.
However HVM guests (and ARM guests) do not change or do not have the
irq_enable pvop, so evtchn_unmask cannot work properly for them.
Considering that having the pending_irq bit set when unmask_evtchn is
called is not very common, and it is simpler to keep the
native_irq_enable implementation for HVM guests (and ARM guests), the
best thing to do is just use the EVTCHNOP_unmask hypercall (Xen
re-injects pending events in response).
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
---
drivers/xen/events.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
index eae0d0b..0132505 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
@@ -372,8 +372,11 @@ static void unmask_evtchn(int port)
BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
- /* Slow path (hypercall) if this is a non-local port. */
- if (unlikely(cpu != cpu_from_evtchn(port))) {
+ /* Slow path (hypercall) if this is a non-local port or if this is
+ * an hvm domain and an event is pending (hvm domains don't have
+ * their own implementation of irq_enable). */
+ if (unlikely((cpu != cpu_from_evtchn(port)) ||
+ (xen_hvm_domain() && sync_test_bit(port, &s->evtchn_pending[0])))) {
struct evtchn_unmask unmask = { .port = port };
(void)HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op(EVTCHNOP_unmask, &unmask);
} else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists