[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120622163643.GK24632@erda.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:36:43 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists()
On 22.06.12 17:53:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> My gcc wants me to add the below to avoid used uninitialized warns:
>
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -211,8 +211,9 @@ static bool check_hw_exists(void)
> * that don't trap on the MSR access and always return 0s.
> */
> val = 0xabcdUL;
> - ret = wrmsrl_safe(x86_pmu_event_addr(0), val);
> - ret |= rdmsrl_safe(x86_pmu_event_addr(0), &val_new);
> + reg = x86_pmu_event_addr(0);
> + ret = wrmsrl_safe(reg, val);
> + ret |= rdmsrl_safe(reg, &val_new);
Yes, this is correct. It fixes also correct reporting of reg if it
fails here.
I wonder why my gcc this didn't report, its 4.4.5.
Thanks,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists