linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dm thin: reinstate missing mempool_free in cell_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:48:44 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Touko Korpela <touko.korpela@....fi>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm thin: reinstate missing mempool_free in
 cell_release_singleton

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:21:27PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:59:48AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > 3.3-stable pulled in upstream commit
> > > 6f94a4c45a6f744383f9f695dde019998db3df55 (dm thin: fix stacked bi_next
> > > usage)
> > > 
> > > But later in the 3.4 development window it was determined that that
> > > commit introduced a significant leak.  The following upstream commit
> > > fixes it (but unfortunately didn't cc: stable).
> >
> > 3.3 is end-of-life, so there's not much I can do with the 3.3-stable
> > tree anymore, sorry.  If there's any other tree I should apply this to
> > that is active (i.e. 3.0 or 3.4), please let me know.
> 
> Looks like you forgot 3.2 that is affected (since 3.2.14).

I don't maintain 3.2 :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/