linux-kernel - big allocation failure during tracing init.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120622193650.GA20098@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:36:50 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: big allocation failure during tracing init.

I just hit this during a low-memory test..

trinity-child6: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0xc0d0
Pid: 25842, comm: trinity-child6 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc3+ #95
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81147fab>] warn_alloc_failed+0xeb/0x150
 [<ffffffff8114c2d6>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x836/0xab0
 [<ffffffff8118a630>] alloc_pages_current+0xb0/0x120
 [<ffffffff8108e377>] ? local_clock+0x47/0x60
 [<ffffffff811471d4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
 [<ffffffff811963c9>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x39/0x190
 [<ffffffff810b3108>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xc0
 [<ffffffff81196cbe>] __kmalloc+0x23e/0x290
 [<ffffffff811d270c>] __seq_open_private+0x2c/0x80
 [<ffffffff81114d8c>] tracing_open+0x8c/0x340
 [<ffffffff811aadbf>] do_dentry_open+0x25f/0x310
 [<ffffffff81114d00>] ? tracing_iter_reset+0x90/0x90
 [<ffffffff811ac2fe>] nameidata_to_filp+0x7e/0xe0
 [<ffffffff811bc427>] do_last+0x4a7/0x9f0
 [<ffffffff811be2ac>] path_openat+0xdc/0x410
 [<ffffffff8108e377>] ? local_clock+0x47/0x60
 [<ffffffff811cd231>] ? alloc_fd+0x171/0x220
 [<ffffffff811cd231>] ? alloc_fd+0x171/0x220
 [<ffffffff811be701>] do_filp_open+0x41/0xa0
 [<ffffffff816501e5>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x35/0x60
 [<ffffffff811cd231>] ? alloc_fd+0x171/0x220
 [<ffffffff811ac44d>] do_sys_open+0xed/0x1c0
 [<ffffffff811ac564>] sys_openat+0x14/0x20
 [<ffffffff81657b96>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f

I guess the problem is on kernels built with CONFIG_MAXCPUS, struct trace_iterator
can be pretty large due to this embedded in it..

	struct ring_buffer_iter *buffer_iter[NR_CPUS];

Any thoughts on how to change that to a smaller dynamic data structure,
without adding too much overhead to tracing ? (I'm assuming a linked-list walk
for eg would be excessive?)

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/