[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120622125551.269552c2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:55:51 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs: introduce pipe-only dump mode suid_dumpable=3
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:24:13 -0700
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> The value
> of suid_dumpable=2 is now historic, and attempting to set this sysctl
> value returns -EINVAL.
This sounds a bit harsh - will it not cause existing configurations to
immediately break? If so, would it not be better to retain the =2 mode
for a while, and emit a nice warning when it is set?
>
> ...
>
> +/* Allow only the valid suid_dumpable values. */
> +static int do_proc_dointvec_suid_dumpable_conv(bool *negp,
> + unsigned long *lvalp, int *valp, int write, void *data)
> +{
> + if (write) {
> + int val = *negp ? -*lvalp : *lvalp;
> + if (val != SUID_DUMPABLE_DISABLED &&
> + val != SUID_DUMPABLE_ENABLED &&
> + val != SUID_DUMPABLE_PIPE_ONLY)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + *valp = val;
> + } else {
> + int val = *valp;
> + if (val < 0) {
> + *negp = true;
> + *lvalp = (unsigned long)-val;
> + } else {
> + *negp = false;
> + *lvalp = (unsigned long)val;
Those two typecasts are unneeded.
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists