[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120623093934.GN27816@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:39:34 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] memcg: optimize memcg_get_hierarchical_limit
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 02:18:17PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Optimize memcg_get_hierarchical_limit to save cpu cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
I really would have thought the compiler would detect it, but this
patch actually does switch around move and jump.
But this is miniscule and anything but a fastpath...
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index c821e36..1ca79e2 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3917,9 +3917,9 @@ static void memcg_get_hierarchical_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>
> min_limit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT);
> min_memsw_limit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT);
> - cgroup = memcg->css.cgroup;
> if (!memcg->use_hierarchy)
> goto out;
> + cgroup = memcg->css.cgroup;
>
> while (cgroup->parent) {
> cgroup = cgroup->parent;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists