linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 22:32:02 -0300
From:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system

On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 09:26 AM, Nix wrote:
> > On 20 Jun 2012, Borislav Petkov uttered the following:
> >> I know, right. Whose idea was it to do it like that I don't know.
> >> AFAICT, Intel delivers ucode as a single blob too, so why split it? The
> >> driver picks out the right blob anyway.
> > 
> > Only if supplied over the old interface. Over the new interface,
> > we just see
> > 
> >     microcode: error! Bad data in microcode data file
> > 
> > in the log. So clearly the driver doesn't know how to split up the
> > microcode.bin that Intel provides, and (until Henrique's iucode-tool or
> > something like it becomes ubiquitous) the old interface, and
> > microcode_ctl, cannot be removed.
> 
> Even more importantly, to do early microcode updates we need to stash
> away not just the current CPU's microcode but any compatible CPU's
> microcode, so just loading a single one is not going to work...

Well, THAT is rather difficult with Intel.  You really have no choice
other than packing all microcodes, or just the ones for the current
system.  For all microcodes, it will compresses to around 350KiB with
gzip.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/