[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201206232111.25411.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:11:25 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] kmap_atomic cleanup for 3.6
On Saturday 23 June 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
> After few releases, it seems there are no more callers
> using the deprecated form of kmap_atomic(), the one
> with two parameters. So we can remove it now and remove
> the KM_* definition except KM_TYPE_NR together.
>
> All the patches are available at:
>
> git://github.com/congwang/linux.git #kmap_atomic
>
What is the significance of having an architecture-specific
definition for KM_TYPE_NR now? Should that be replaced
with a fixed value in include/linux/highmem.h so we can
remove the asm/kmap_types.h files entirely?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists