linux-kernel - Re: Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVeJYwpgHjAFp5Q7PazOjeDvN_etrnej987Rc94TjXfAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:14:43 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> I wish we had a single call - say, memblock_die(), or whatever - so
> that there's a clear indication that memblock usage is done, but yeah
> maybe another day.  Will review the patch itself.  BTW, can't you post
> patches inline anymore?  Attaching is better than corrupt but is still
> a bit annoying for review.

please check the three patches:

Thanks

Yinghai

Download attachment "fix_free_memblock_reserve_v4_5.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (6770 bytes)

Download attachment "fix_free_memblock_memory.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (3624 bytes)

Download attachment "memblock_clear_check.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (5256 bytes)