[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120624204711.GK5390@mwanda>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:47:11 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Style cleanup of iwctl
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 09:45:58PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Clean up the files iwctl.c and iwctl.h to match the official
> CodingStyle a bit more closely.
>
> This is *not* a complete cleanup, but it brings the files quite close
> to the accepted style compared to the state they were originally in
> (which was a complete mess IMHO).
>
> It's mostly just whitespace changes, but there are also a few
> pointless casts that were removed, a few tiny reshuffelings of code to
> reduce indentation etc, but nothing major. There are no functional
> changes.
>
> I could have split this in multiple patches, I guess, but then I'd
> probably have ended up with a bunch of patches all touching the same
> lines multiple times in order to make multiple different changes and
> that didn't seem worth it. I opted to just do the whole thing in one
> big patch, then we at least have a sane base upon which to apply
> future smaller cleanups.
Nope. It is worth it. Broken out patches are a million times
easier to review.
It frustrates me that you would do things like this when you know
the rules. Which part is difficult to understand?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists