[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE77FB9.8010209@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:59:37 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
CC: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, JBeulich@...e.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, cpufeature: Rename X86_FEATURE_DTS to
X86_FEATURE_DTHERM
On 06/24/2012 01:39 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> It isn't about finger-pointing, it is about a failure of process; we had
> a process that would have caught this problem and the process failed.
> There are certainly blame enough to go around, but I think one of the
> things here is that lack of response isn't necessary an ACK - it may
> actually be that the patch looked at first glance like it had no impact
> on our area (incorrectly as it turned out.)
>
Let me be clear: I'm not blaming you, or anyone else, personally. Like
many other failures, there were a number of steps in the chain here, one
of them being not checking this in the script from the beginning, and
that one is mine.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists