linux-kernel - [PATCH] mm/memcg: add MAX_CHARGE_BATCH to limit unnecessary charge overhead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1340504169-5344-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:16:09 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcg: add MAX_CHARGE_BATCH to limit unnecessary charge overhead

From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Since exceeded unused cached charges would add pressure to
mem_cgroup_do_charge, more overhead would burn cpu cycles when
mem_cgroup_do_charge cause page reclaim or even OOM be triggered
just for such exceeded unused cached charges. Add MAX_CHARGE_BATCH
to limit max cached charges.

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 0e092eb..1ff317a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1954,6 +1954,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_update_page_stat(struct page *page,
  * TODO: maybe necessary to use big numbers in big irons.
  */
 #define CHARGE_BATCH	32U
+
+/*
+ * Max size of charge stock. Since exceeded unused cached charges would
+ * add pressure to mem_cgroup_do_charge which will cause page reclaim or
+ * even oom be triggered.
+ */
+#define MAX_CHARGE_BATCH 1024U
+
 struct memcg_stock_pcp {
 	struct mem_cgroup *cached; /* this never be root cgroup */
 	unsigned int nr_pages;
@@ -2250,6 +2258,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	unsigned int batch = max(CHARGE_BATCH, nr_pages);
 	int nr_oom_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
+	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -2320,6 +2329,13 @@ again:
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 
+	stock = &get_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
+	if (memcg == stock->cached && stock->nr_pages) {
+		if (stock->nr_pages > MAX_CHARGE_BATCH)
+			batch = nr_pages;
+	}
+	put_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
+
 	do {
 		bool oom_check;
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/