[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340550156.14120.53.camel@bling.home>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 09:02:36 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4][RFC] kvm: eoi_eventfd
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 15:56 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/23/2012 01:16 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > I think we're probably also going to need something like this.
> > When running in non-accelerated qemu, we're going to have to
> > create some kind of EOI notifier for drivers. VFIO can make
> > additional improvements when running on KVM so it will probably
> > make use of the KVM_IRQFD_LEVEL_EOI interface, but we don't
> > want to have a generic EOI notifier in qemu that just stops
> > working when kvm-ioapic is enabled.
>
> Why?
Hmm, I must be missing something or not describing it correctly, because
it seems obvious. If we create a dependency in qemu of needing to know
when an eoi occurs and notifier a driver and have no way to fulfill that
dependency when running on kvm... that'd be bad, right? I don't want to
assume that every consumer of such an interface would prefer to make use
of an irqfd. Not sure if that answers your question though. Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists