[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1340624336-15048-1-git-send-email-airlied@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:38:56 +0100
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
To: len.brown@...el.com, torvalds@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Igor Murzov <intergalactic.anonymous@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Still use ACPI backlight control if _DOS doesn't exist
This is a regression introduced by commit
ea9f8856bd6d4ed45885b06a338f7362cd6c60e5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43168
Some platforms don't have _DOS control method, but the ACPI
backlight still works.
We do not want to lose the backlight control ability on these platforms.
[airlied: this is breaking nouveau really badly on 3.4 and after and there is
no movement on sending it upstream, so please apply]
Cc: Igor Murzov <intergalactic.anonymous@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: len.brown@...el.com
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: rtd3/drivers/acpi/video.c
===================================================================
--- rtd3.orig/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ rtd3/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -565,8 +565,14 @@ acpi_video_bus_DOS(struct acpi_video_bus
video->dos_setting = arg0.integer.value;
status = acpi_evaluate_object(video->device->handle, "_DOS",
&args, NULL);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
- return -EIO;
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ /*
+ * some platforms don't have _DOS, but the ACPI
+ * backlight control still works
+ */
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "No _DOS\n"));
+ return 0;
+ }
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists