[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1206251014260.1770-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:24:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: chao xie <xiechao.linux@...il.com>
cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<rjw@...k.pl>, <pavel@....cz>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: pm runtime and system suspend resume
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, chao xie wrote:
> There is no more question about runtime_idle and runtime_suspend
> as i understand that runtime_idle indicates that the device is idle,
> clock may be off, no function there,
runtime_idle indicates the the device is idle and the usage counter is
0, right. Your runtime_idle routine is allowed to call
pm_runtime_suspend, pm_runtime_autosuspend, or a similar function.
> runtime_suspend means that the
> device my be power off, and making it rework may need some
> initialization work.
> So in the scenario, for USB, there are some clocks relates to it and
> there is a phy attached to it.
> When phy is powered off, it need to be initialized again, and it will
> take some time.
> So in the driver, when there is no action, we will call
> pm_runtime_put, and it will shut off the clocks, for
> pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend, it will shut off the phy to save more
> power.
I'm not sure what you mean.
There are only two differences between pm_runtime_put and
pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend:
pm_runtime_put calls pm_request_idle, which means your
driver's runtime_idle routine gets called asynchronously;
pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend pm_runtime_suspend, which means
your driver's runtime_suspend routine gets called
synchronously.
Your runtime_idle routine shouldn't turn off anything. All it should
do is call pm_runtime_suspend (or something similar). Thus, in either
case your driver's runtime_suspend routine will be called. It can turn
off both the clocks and the phy.
> Then how do we call pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend if it already calls
> pm_runtime_put? Do we need do call pm_runtime_get before call
> pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend because the usage_count is not 0?
You should always call pm_runtime_get (or one of its variants) before
calling pm_runtime_put (or any of its variants). Increments and
decrements of the usage counter must balance.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists