[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE88E9A.4040605@xenotime.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:15:22 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>
CC: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix build warning
On 06/25/2012 08:19 AM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
> Fix:
> fs/ubifs/dir.c: In function 'ubifs_rename':
> fs/ubifs/dir.c:972:15: warning: 'saved_nlink' may be used uninitialized
> in this function
>
> Initilize saved_nlink to 0
Does nlink need to be init at all? is the warning bogus or valid?
If the warning is bogus, the preferred solution is:
#include <linux/compiler-gcc.h>
...
unsigned int uninitialized_var(nlink);
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/dir.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> index a6d42ef..d5b8cb1e 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> @@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static int ubifs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> struct ubifs_budget_req ino_req = { .dirtied_ino = 1,
> .dirtied_ino_d = ALIGN(old_inode_ui->data_len, 8) };
> struct timespec time;
> - unsigned int saved_nlink;
> + unsigned int saved_nlink = 0;
>
> /*
> * Budget request settings: deletion direntry, new direntry, removing
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists