[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE8B2D1.3070600@corelatus.se>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:49:53 +0200
From: Thomas Lange <thomas@...elatus.se>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched: clock wrap bug in 2.6.35-stable kills scheduling
On 2012-06-25 12:38, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 11:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 19:32 +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
>>> Bug was introduced in 2.6.35.12 and is still present in linux-2.6.35.y HEAD.
>>
>> Ok, so nobody cares about that.. what does something recent like 3.5-rc4
>> do?
I haven't tested yet. I will try to find the time to do that.
>> If that's fixed, find the patch that fixes it. If not, we'll have a
>> look.
Commit fe44d62 removed the if-clause that caused the problem. Most likely, this
solved the problem.
>
>
> If anything, I think something like the below ought to cure things.
I agree. Either we make sure that sched_clock() never wraps or if it wraps,
that it wraps shortly after boot to catch problems early.
>
> ---
> kernel/sched/clock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> index c685e31..a1a128a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
> */
> unsigned long long __attribute__((weak)) sched_clock(void)
> {
> - return (unsigned long long)(jiffies - INITIAL_JIFFIES)
> + return (unsigned long long)(get_jiffies_64() - INITIAL_JIFFIES)
> * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_clock);
/Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists