[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201206252245.07769.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:45:07 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Preeti Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa S Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: boot hang on commit "PM / ACPI: Fix suspend/resume regression caused by cpuidle cleanup."
On Monday, June 25, 2012, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> From: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Fix suspend/resume regression caused by cpuidle cleanup.
>
> Commit e978aa7d7d57d04eb5f88a7507c4fb98577def77 ( cpuidle: Move
> dev->last_residency update to driver enter routine; remove dev->last_state)
> was breaking suspend on laptops, as reported in the below link
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/11/164
>
> This was fixed in commit 3439a8da16bcad6b0982ece938c9f8299bb53584
> (ACPI / cpuidle: Remove acpi_idle_suspend (to fix suspend regression)
> by removing acpi_idle_suspend flag.
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/14/74
>
> But this did fix did not work on all systems
> as Suspend/resume regression was reported on Lenovo S10-3
> recently by Dave.
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/27/115
> It looked like with commit e978aa7d broke suspend and
> with commit 3439a8da resume was not working with acpi_idle driver.
>
> This patch fixes the regression that caused this issue
> in the first place. acpi_idle_suspend flag is essential on
> some x86 systems to prevent the cpus from going to deeper C-states
> when suspend is triggered ( commit b04e7bdb984 )
> So reverting the commit 3439a8da is essential.
>
> By default, irqs are disabled in cpu_idle arch specific call
> and re-enabled in idle state return path . During suspend,
> the acpi_idle_suspend flag is set, which
> prevents the cpus from going to deeper idle states,
> it is essential to enabling the irqs in this return path too.
>
> To address the suspend issue,
> we were not re-enabling the interrupts while returning from
> acpi_idle_enter_bm() routine if acpi_idle_suspend flag is set.
> and this caused suspend failure.
>
> In addition to the above, to improve the readability of the code,
> return of -ENIVAL is replaced with -EBUSY in acpi_idle_suspend
> return path. Implying that the system is currently busy when suspend
> is in progress, which prevents the cpus from entering deeper C-states.
>
> ---
> This patch applies on 3.5-rc2
>
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Dav Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Preeti Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Looking good. I'll give it a bit of testing and put it into linux-next for
a day or two to make sure nobody sees any more problems with it.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index f3decb3..47a8caa 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ static void lapic_timer_state_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> /*
> * Suspend / resume control
> */
> +static int acpi_idle_suspend;
> static u32 saved_bm_rld;
>
> static void acpi_idle_bm_rld_save(void)
> @@ -242,13 +243,21 @@ static void acpi_idle_bm_rld_restore(void)
>
> int acpi_processor_suspend(struct acpi_device * device, pm_message_t state)
> {
> + if (acpi_idle_suspend == 1)
> + return 0;
> +
> acpi_idle_bm_rld_save();
> + acpi_idle_suspend = 1;
> return 0;
> }
>
> int acpi_processor_resume(struct acpi_device * device)
> {
> + if (acpi_idle_suspend == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> acpi_idle_bm_rld_restore();
> + acpi_idle_suspend = 0;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -754,6 +763,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>
> local_irq_disable();
>
> + if (acpi_idle_suspend) {
> + local_irq_enable();
> + cpu_relax();
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> lapic_timer_state_broadcast(pr, cx, 1);
> kt1 = ktime_get_real();
> acpi_idle_do_entry(cx);
> @@ -823,6 +838,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>
> local_irq_disable();
>
> + if (acpi_idle_suspend) {
> + local_irq_enable();
> + cpu_relax();
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
> current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
> /*
> @@ -907,14 +928,21 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> drv, drv->safe_state_index);
> } else {
> local_irq_disable();
> - acpi_safe_halt();
> + if (!acpi_idle_suspend)
> + acpi_safe_halt();
> local_irq_enable();
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EBUSY;
> }
> }
>
> local_irq_disable();
>
> + if (acpi_idle_suspend) {
> + local_irq_enable();
> + cpu_relax();
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
> current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
> /*
>
> Cheers,
> Deepthi
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists