linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Minimal build without libelf dependency (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sjdkuscr.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:51:00 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Minimal build without libelf dependency (v2)

Hi, David

On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:24:13 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/22/12 10:14 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> I think at least the .dymsym symbol table is present in DSOs, aka
>> libraries, otherwise how will they dynamicly link?
>>
> yes. I meant debug information wise - everything is stripped during
> packaging phase, so onbox analysis is severely limited in address to
> symbol resolutions.
>

Right, I was saying about a case of the onbox recording and off-line
analysis - I hope I didn't use vague words here. And I thought that
supporting build-id is helpful (not crucial, though) for the case too.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/