[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE95015.7000707@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:00:53 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: mst@...hat.com, akong@...hat.com, habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, haixiao@...iper.net,
jwhan@...ewood.snu.ac.kr, ernesto.martin@...sat.com,
mashirle@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
shemminger@...tta.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] tuntap: per queue 64 bit stats
On 06/25/2012 08:52 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:59 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> As we've added multiqueue support for tun/tap, this patch convert the statistics
>> to use per-queue 64 bit statistics.
> LLTX means you can have several cpus calling TX path in parallel.
>
> So tx stats are wrong (even before this patch), and racy after this
> patch (if several cpu access same queue, it seems to be possible)
>
> u64_stats_update_begin(&tfile->stats.tx_syncp);
> tfile->stats.tx_packets++;
> tfile->stats.tx_bytes += total;
> u64_stats_update_end(&tfile->stats.tx_syncp);
>
> This can break horribly if several cpus run this code using same 'tfile'
> pointer.
Yes, looks like it's hard to use NETIF_F_LLTX without breaking the u64
statistics, may worth to use tx lock and alloc_netdev_mq().
> I suggest this patch comes before 'tuntap: multiqueue support' in the
> serie.
Sure, thanks.
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists