linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Check for failed voltage sets before checking for delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF+7xWk_Unkg5hTbYLkuTD7DQbWgC1XXcLd96CXgyUmC3b07nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:51:45 +0800
From:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Check for failed voltage sets before
 checking for delay

2012/6/26 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> There is no need to consider waiting for the voltage to ramp if we
> didn't manage to set it and looking at the return value is going to be
> cheaper than is_enabled().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/