[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120626112524.GF31393@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:25:24 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP7XX: Remove omap730.h and omap850.h
* Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> [120618 03:02]:
> No file includes omap730.h or omap850.h. That's not surprising, as
> commit e6684f7132c6e6333e96407b06910bebaa4c1935 ("OMAP7XX: Create
> omap7xx.h") created a header that was "intended to replace omap730.h and
> omap850.h", while all "values defined [in omap7xx.h] are identical to
> those in both the old files". So it seems it was just an oversight to
> keep both the old files after commit
> 7a8f48f8c611ac8c07023260258e2fec312b9242 ("OMAP7XX: omap_uwire.c:
> Convert to omap7xx.h") converted the last file still including one of
> those two old files.
>
> Convert the last reference to omap730.h to a reference to omap7xx.h too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
> ---
> 0) Tested only by using various git commands on the (history of the)
> tree.
Thanks, nice catch :) I'll apply this into fixes-non-critical.
> 1) A related cleanup could be to remove cpu_is_omap730 and
> cpu_is_omap850, as both macros seem unused.
Yes seems like we could do that. Care to do a patch for that?
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists