[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120626143135.GC20573@bandura.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:31:35 +0200
From: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@...il.com>,
Josh Hunt <joshhunt00@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: Kerneloops.org defunct?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 07:29:49AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:16:54AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On 6/26/2012 12:14 AM, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > > All in all, it seems to be optimistic so far, and I hope we will
> > > have some web gui this summer. Although we don't have much oopses
> > > reported yet and changing the ip address of kerneloops.org, as
> > > mentioned before, might help.
> >
> > this is the problem indeed. When Fedora stopped submitting oopses to
> > kerneloops.org, the project became suddenly of much much less value.
> > (this was well before the kernel.org issues)
> Is this still an issue ? I thought Anton's change was made to the Fedora
> package, though I may be wrong. Either case, Anton might have some influence at
> Fedora.
My understanding was - kerneloops.org just shutted down gradually,
it was slow at the beginning and off now. I didn't expect nor know
Fedora stopped reporting.
We are also one step behind putting 'abrt-dump-oops' binary into
kexec-tools to get even more oopses. :)
Anton.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists