linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] locks: prevent side-effects of locks_release_private before file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120626152336.GD14279@fieldses.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:23:37 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...il.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] locks: prevent side-effects of
 locks_release_private before file_lock is initialized

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:10:35PM -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Just to let you know that I just tested the patch below on top of
> 3.5.0-rc4 and it works fine...
> 
> Do you like the idea of this second patch or do you prefer the
> __locks_free_lock() one?

Like I said:

> Let's just go with your first patch and free the thing by hand (but
> add a comment explaining why).
> 
> Then come back and figure out how to make the interface clearer once
> we've got the bug fixed.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/