linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.32.y] drm/i915: Attempt to fix watermark setup on 85x (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120626162122.GA6413@1wt.eu>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:21:22 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
Cc:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
	Lukas Anzinger <l.anzinger@...il.com>,
	Adam Jackson <ajax@...hat.com>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.32.y] drm/i915: Attempt to fix watermark setup on 85x (v2)

Hi Jonathan,

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:14:58PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> From: Adam Jackson <ajax@...hat.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:20:57 -0400
> 
> commit 8f4695ed1c9e068772bcce4cd4ff03f88d57a008 upstream.
> 
> IS_MOBILE() catches 85x, so we'd always try to use the 9xx FIFO sizing;
> since there's an explicit 85x version, this seems wrong.
> 
> v2: Handle 830m correctly too.
> 
> [jn: backport to 2.6.32.y to address
>  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42839]

(...)

Thank you, I've queued it for 2.6.32.60.

Best regards,
Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/