[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKUOC8Uy_YeoMW_S_JZbZUr1i_3mJGNfrNs676rc_o28WJGhjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:58:41 -0700
From: Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix fork() error path to not crash.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 18:18 -0700, Salman Qazi wrote:
>> In dup_task_struct, if arch_dup_task_struct fails, the clean up
>> code fails to clean up correctly. That's because the clean up
>> code depends on unininitalized ti->task pointer. We fix this
>> by making sure that the task and thread_info know about each other
>> before we attempt to take the error path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>
>
> Cute, however did you find that?
Our test infrastructure folks have developed a fault injection
framework geared towards detecting bugs triggered by memory allocation
failures in random places.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists