[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120626204305.GA29439@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:43:06 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] x86 mce: use new printk recursion disabling
interface
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:14:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That already does bust_spinlocks() which already increments the
> oops_in_progress thing, so WTF are you doing anyway?
Hmm, that's interesting. So Shuox said they hit this in some sort of
"MTBF testing on Android ATOM mobiles":
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133903834107577&w=2
And I'm guessing they want this probably because they set fake_panic so
that we don't bust_spinlocks() in mce_panic().
Shoux, Yanmin, what's the dealio here?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists