[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120626235804.GA7525@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:58:04 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH -v4 6/6] fault-injection: add notifier error
injection testing scripts
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:31:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> My overall take on the fault-injection code is that there has been a
> disappointing amount of uptake: I don't see many developers using them
> for whitebox testing their stuff. I guess this patchset addresses
> that, in a way.
I added support for make-it-fail to my syscall fuzzer a while ago.
(if the file exists, the child processes set it before calling the fuzzed syscall).
I've not had a chance to really play with it, because I find enough problems
already even without it.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists