linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH -v4 6/6] fault-injection: add notifier error injection testing scripts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:58:04 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH -v4 6/6] fault-injection: add notifier error
 injection testing scripts

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:31:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

 > My overall take on the fault-injection code is that there has been a
 > disappointing amount of uptake: I don't see many developers using them
 > for whitebox testing their stuff.  I guess this patchset addresses
 > that, in a way.

I added support for make-it-fail to my syscall fuzzer a while ago.
(if the file exists, the child processes set it before calling the fuzzed syscall).
I've not had a chance to really play with it, because I find enough problems
already even without it.

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/