linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120626143638.278cd26a1fe00b4161ba7691@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:36:38 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
include/asm-generic/bug.h between commit 09682c1dd382 ("bug.h: Fix up
CONFIG_BUG=n implicit function declarations") from Linus' tree and commit
7b37393f13d5 ("bug.h: Fix x86 !CONFIG_BUG build regression") from the tip
tree.

These are trying to do the same thing, so I used the version from Linus'
tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped