lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:04:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Rosenberg <mrosenberg@...illa.com> To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: perf report does not get along with perf record -A Derp. I went through all of that effort to make sure I had recorded everything about my setup, and I forgot the versiou perf version 3.2.17 built unpatched from a 3.4.4 tarball ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Ahern" <dsahern@...il.com> To: "Martin Rosenberg" <mrosenberg@...illa.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 9:40:49 PM Subject: Re: perf report does not get along with perf record -A On 6/25/12 6:10 PM, Martin Rosenberg wrote: > I'm working under the assumption that if I want to collect statistics from multiple runs of a program, I can do this by running > perf record prog; perf record -A prog; perf record -A prog > > I've found that running perf record twice results in perf report hanging, and running it more than twice results in perf report first spewing a message about invalid formats, then crashing. > A log of the session, as well as the binary, its input and perf.data can be found at: What does 'perf --version' show? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists