[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340783389.3175.11.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:49:49 +0100
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Cong Meng <mc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stefanha@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxram@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Fix BLKSECTGET ioctl of sg device caculation
mistake.
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 15:29 +0800, Cong Meng wrote:
> Fix BLKSECTGET ioctl of sg device caculation mistake.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sg.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sg.c b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
> index eacd46b..c424602 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
> @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ sg_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd_in, unsigned long arg)
> return -ENODEV;
> return scsi_ioctl(sdp->device, cmd_in, p);
> case BLKSECTGET:
> - return put_user(queue_max_sectors(sdp->device->request_queue) * 512,
> + return put_user(queue_max_sectors(sdp->device->request_queue),
Really, no. This would break all existing user of the ioctl.
Even if you can find a document somewhere that says BLKSECTGET should
return sectors instead of bytes, we have to go with the ABI we've been
exporting for decades and fix up the document.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists