[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120627090322.GI31212@elgon.mountain>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:03:23 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Subject: [patch -resend] sgi-xp: nested calls to spin_lock_irqsave()
The code here has a nested spin_lock_irqsave(). It's not needed since
IRQs are already disabled and it causes a problem because it means that
IRQs won't be enabled again at the end. The second call to
spin_lock_irqsave() will overwrite the value of irq_flags and we can't
restore the proper settings.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
I have added Jack Steiner to the CC list. This was originally sent on
Thu, 15 Dec 2011.
diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c
index 17bbacb..87b251a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c
@@ -452,9 +452,9 @@ xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(struct xpc_partition *part,
if (msg->activate_gru_mq_desc_gpa !=
part_uv->activate_gru_mq_desc_gpa) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&part_uv->flags_lock, irq_flags);
+ spin_lock(&part_uv->flags_lock);
part_uv->flags &= ~XPC_P_CACHED_ACTIVATE_GRU_MQ_DESC_UV;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&part_uv->flags_lock, irq_flags);
+ spin_unlock(&part_uv->flags_lock);
part_uv->activate_gru_mq_desc_gpa =
msg->activate_gru_mq_desc_gpa;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists