[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FEACFD9.7020503@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:18:17 +0400
From: Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf sched replay: fix event lookup
On 06/26/2012 03:20 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
>> Fair enough. The method should be a simple wrapper to libtraceevent APIs
>> like this patch.
>
> The pevent thing is per perf.data file, so I made it stop being static
> and become a perf_session member, so tools processing perf.data files
> use perf_session and _there_ we read the event into session->pevent and
> then have to change everywhere to stop using that single global pevent
> variable and use the per session one.
>
> Dmitry, can you test the attached patch to check if it solves the
> problems you reported?
This looks good and works for my x86 <-> ARM tests.
> Note that it _doesn't_ fall backs to trace__event_id, as we're not
> interested at all in what is present in the
> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events in the workstation doing the analysis,
> just in what is in the perf.data file.
Agree.
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists