[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4FEB236C020000780008C392@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:14:52 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Jinsong Liu" <jinsong.liu@...el.com>,
"Will Auld" <will.auld@...el.com>
Cc: "Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Donald D Dugger" <donald.d.dugger@...el.com>,
"Haitao Shan" <haitao.shan@...el.com>,
"Jun Nakajima" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
"Susie Li" <susie.li@...el.com>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Xiantao Zhang" <xiantao.zhang@...el.com>,
"Yunhong Jiang" <yunhong.jiang@...el.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Keir Fraser" <keir@....org>
Subject: Re: [xen vMCE RFC V0.2] xen vMCE design
>>> On 27.06.12 at 05:51, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@...el.com> wrote:
> This is updated xen vMCE design foils, according to comments from community
> recently.
>
> This foils focus on vMCE part of Xen MCA, so as Keir said, it's some dense.
> Later Will will present a document to elaborate more, including Intel MCA
> and surrounding features and Xen implementation.
For MCi_CTL2 you probably meant to say "allow setting CMCI_EN
and error count threshold"?
The 2-bank approach also needs to be brought in line with the
current host derived value in MCG_CAP, especially if the code to
implement this new model doesn't make it into 4.2 (which would
generally save a larger value).
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists