[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FEB1B06.4050309@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:39:02 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
CC: kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v5] deal with guest panicked event accoring to -onpanic
parameter
On 2012-06-27 09:02, Wen Congyang wrote:
> When the guest is panicked, it will write 0x1 to the port KVM_PV_PORT.
> So if qemu reads 0x1 from this port, we can do the folloing three
> things according to the parameter -onpanic:
> 1. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED only
> 2. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and pause the guest
> 3. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and poweroff the guest
> 4. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and reset the guest
>
> Note: if we emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED only, and the management
> application does not receive this event(the management may not
> run when the event is emitted), the management won't know the
> guest is panicked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kvm-all.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kvm-stub.c | 9 +++++
> kvm.h | 3 ++
> qemu-options.hx | 15 ++++++++
> vl.c | 10 +++++
> 5 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index f8e4328..9494dd2 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
> #include <stdarg.h>
>
> #include <linux/kvm.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_para.h>
>
> #include "qemu-common.h"
> #include "qemu-barrier.h"
> @@ -32,6 +34,9 @@
> #include "bswap.h"
> #include "memory.h"
> #include "exec-memory.h"
> +#include "iorange.h"
> +#include "qemu-objects.h"
> +#include "monitor.h"
>
> /* This check must be after config-host.h is included */
> #ifdef CONFIG_EVENTFD
> @@ -1931,3 +1936,99 @@ int kvm_on_sigbus(int code, void *addr)
> {
> return kvm_arch_on_sigbus(code, addr);
> }
> +
> +/* Possible values for action parameter. */
> +#define PANICKED_REPORT 1 /* emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED only */
> +#define PANICKED_PAUSE 2 /* emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and pause VM */
> +#define PANICKED_POWEROFF 3 /* emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and quit VM */
> +#define PANICKED_RESET 4 /* emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and reset VM */
> +
> +static int panicked_action = PANICKED_REPORT;
> +
> +static void kvm_pv_port_read(IORange *iorange, uint64_t offset, unsigned width,
> + uint64_t *data)
> +{
> + *data = (1 << KVM_PV_FEATURE_PANICKED);
> +}
> +
> +static void panicked_mon_event(const char *action)
> +{
> + QObject *data;
> +
> + data = qobject_from_jsonf("{ 'action': %s }", action);
> + monitor_protocol_event(QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED, data);
> + qobject_decref(data);
> +}
> +
> +static void panicked_perform_action(void)
> +{
> + switch (panicked_action) {
> + case PANICKED_REPORT:
> + panicked_mon_event("report");
> + break;
> +
> + case PANICKED_PAUSE:
> + panicked_mon_event("pause");
> + vm_stop(RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED);
> + break;
> +
> + case PANICKED_POWEROFF:
> + panicked_mon_event("poweroff");
> + exit(0);
> + break;
> + case PANICKED_RESET:
> + panicked_mon_event("reset");
> + qemu_system_reset_request();
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_pv_port_write(IORange *iorange, uint64_t offset, unsigned width,
> + uint64_t data)
> +{
> + if (data == KVM_PV_PANICKED) {
> + panicked_perform_action();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_pv_port_destructor(IORange *iorange)
> +{
> + g_free(iorange);
> +}
> +
> +static IORangeOps pv_io_range_ops = {
> + .read = kvm_pv_port_read,
> + .write = kvm_pv_port_write,
> + .destructor = kvm_pv_port_destructor,
> +};
> +
> +#if defined(KVM_PV_PORT)
> +void kvm_pv_port_init(void)
> +{
> + IORange *pv_io_range = g_malloc(sizeof(IORange));
> +
> + iorange_init(pv_io_range, &pv_io_range_ops, KVM_PV_PORT, 1);
> + ioport_register(pv_io_range);
This modeling is still not ok. We don't open-code ports anymore, we
introduce devices. And this doesn't belong inro generic code as it is
x86-only. Will avoid that #ifdef as well.
Thanks
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists