[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120627200926.GR15811@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:09:26 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: memcg: cat: memory.memsw.* : Operation not supported
Hello, Michal, David.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:04:51PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> I think it's a crappy solution and one that is undocumented in
> Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt. If you can only enable swap accounting
> at boot either via .config or the command line then these files should
> never be added for CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=n or when
> do_swap_account is 0. It's much easier to test if the feature is enabled
> by checking for the presence of these files at the memcg mount point
> rather than doing an open(2) and checking for -EOPNOTSUPP, which isn't
> even a listed error code. I don't care how much cleaner it makes the
> internal memcg code.
Yeah, it's kinda ugly. Taking a step back, do we really need be able
to configure out memsw? How much vmlinux bloat or runtime overhead
are we talking about? I don't think config options need to be this
granular.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists