[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120628083857.GD12447@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:38:57 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, avi@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] kvm: Pass kvm_irqfd to functions
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:24:30PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:09:04 -0600
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Prune this down to just the struct kvm_irqfd so we can avoid
> > changing function definition for every flag or field we use.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
>
> I'm currently trying to find a way to make irqfd workable for s390
> which will likely include using a new field in kvm_irqfd, so I'd like
> to have this change (and I also think it makes the code nicer to read).
> So:
>
> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Unfortunately it looks like we are not sanitizing kvm_irqfd
at all so we won't be able to use the padding :(
We'll need a new ioctl instead.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists