[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206271803280.10830@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Jim Schutt <jaschut@...dia.gov>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: excessive CPU utilization by isolate_freepages?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/21/30
> >> >
> > Not sure if Jim is using memcg; if not, then this won't be helpful.
> >
>
>
> It doesn't related to memcg.
> if compaction_alloc can't find suitable migration target, it returns NULL.
> Then, migrate_pages should be exit.
>
If isolate_freepages() is going to fail, then this zone should have been
skipped when checking for compaction_suitable(). In Jim's perf output,
compaction_suitable() returns COMPACT_CONTINUE for a transparent hugepage.
Why is zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0 low_wmark + 1024, 0, 0) succeeding if
isolate_freepages() is going to fail?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists