linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1340880651.20977.83.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:50:51 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Zhao Chenhui <chenhui.zhao@...escale.com>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, scottwood@...escale.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, leoli@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync

On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 11:38 +0800, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
> 
> 
> The bootloader have done a timebase sync. If we do not need KEXEC or
> HOTPLUG_CPU feature, it is unnecessary to do it again at boot time of
> kernel. I only compile the timebase sync routines
> when users enable KEXEC or HOTPLUG_CPU. 

Still, how much are you really saving ? Is it worth the added mess and
loss of test coverage ?

We have too many conditional stuff like that already.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/