linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: reimplement mem boot option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FEBB377.2080309@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:29:27 +0800
From:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To:	rob@...dley.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: reimplement mem boot option

Pin......

At 06/14/2012 04:12 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> Current mem boot option only can work for non efi environment. If the user
> specifies add_efi_memmap, it cannot work for efi environment. In
> the efi environment, we call e820_add_region() to add the memory map. So
> we can modify __e820_add_region() and the mem boot option can work for
> efi environment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index 4185797..20bc467 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ unsigned long pci_mem_start = 0xaeedbabe;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_mem_start);
>  #endif
> +static u64 mem_limit = ~0ULL;
>  
>  /*
>   * This function checks if any part of the range <start,end> is mapped
> @@ -119,6 +120,20 @@ static void __init __e820_add_region(struct e820map *e820x, u64 start, u64 size,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (start >= mem_limit) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "e820: ignoring [mem %#010llx-%#010llx]\n",
> +		       (unsigned long long)start,
> +		       (unsigned long long)(start + size - 1));
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (mem_limit - start < size) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "e820: ingoring [mem %#010llx-%#010llx]\n",
> +		       (unsigned long long)mem_limit,
> +		       (unsigned long long)(start + size - 1));
> +		size = mem_limit - start;
> +	}
> +
>  	e820x->map[x].addr = start;
>  	e820x->map[x].size = size;
>  	e820x->map[x].type = type;
> @@ -809,7 +824,7 @@ static int userdef __initdata;
>  /* "mem=nopentium" disables the 4MB page tables. */
>  static int __init parse_memopt(char *p)
>  {
> -	u64 mem_size;
> +	char *oldp;
>  
>  	if (!p)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -825,11 +840,11 @@ static int __init parse_memopt(char *p)
>  	}
>  
>  	userdef = 1;
> -	mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
> +	oldp = p;
> +	mem_limit = memparse(p, &p);
>  	/* don't remove all of memory when handling "mem={invalid}" param */
> -	if (mem_size == 0)
> +	if (mem_limit == 0 || p == oldp)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	e820_remove_range(mem_size, ULLONG_MAX - mem_size, E820_RAM, 1);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -881,6 +896,12 @@ early_param("memmap", parse_memmap_opt);
>  
>  void __init finish_e820_parsing(void)
>  {
> +	if (mem_limit != ~0ULL) {
> +		userdef = 1;
> +		e820_remove_range(mem_limit, ULLONG_MAX - mem_limit,
> +				  E820_RAM, 1);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (userdef) {
>  		u32 nr = e820.nr_map;
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/